Sunday, April 24, 2011

The Wonderful Thing about English (Gender optional)

While surfing deviantART, I came across the journal of a wonderful artist from Denmark who was trying to help out an English friend. Apparently, the English girl was writing a story about a race of aliens who existed without gender. There are no boys or girls on this planet, thus, the native tongue--which is strikingly similar to English--has no 'he's or 'she's. This is where the friend met her dilemma. In the English language, it's nearly impossible to refer to others in the third person without using gender, so how were her extra terrestrials supposed to communicate? She came to the conclusion that the only solution would be to use gender neutral words from other languages, which is why her popular danish friend was asking her international audience if they knew of any such words. But while other people were asking "What about other languages?" I was asking, "What about this language?" Why would one want to learn a whole new language for the sake of being gender neutral when they can be gender neutral in their own language? I thought hard about what I know about, not only gender, but pronouns, words that can replace pronouns, and the flexibility of the structure of a sentence in the English language, and here's what I came up with:

There are, in fact, at least several gender neutral pronouns in the English language. "You" is gender neutral, as well as 'they', 'them', 'their', 'they're' and 'that person/those people.' I'll admit that there aren't too many I can think of, but those that I can have a multitude of uses. Trust me, you can get really far with a simple 'they'. I've found myself in many situations where I'm talking to or about a person who's gender is unknown to me for one reason or other and I've had to refer to that person as 'they' or 'them' instead of 'he' or 'she'. That trick has even been used on me on a number of occasions as well, since the screen names I use online (FoolsEnigma, SkyeLunus, SecretsForgotten, etc.) tend to lean to the gender-neutral side, and I've been mistaken for a boy on several occasions.

Using a person's actual name instead of 'he', 'she', 'they', or 'them' is also pretty effective, and even necessary in a situation where you are referring to more than one person at a time. For example, this is a normal conversation where gender is apparent:

Person 1: "Did you hear about Jordan and Kendell?"
Person 2: "No, what happened?"
Person 1: "Well, Jordan said that she wanted to [insert something here], but he didn't want to do that, he wanted to [insert something else here]. She got totally upset and yelled at him, and somehow 'accidentally' dumped her nachos in his hair!"

This is a conversation where the gender apparent words (he and she) are replaced with 'they', 'their' and other variations of those words.

Person 1: "Did you hear about Jordan and Kendell?"
Person 2: "No, what happened?"
Person 1: "Well, Jordan said that they wanted to [insert something here], but they didn't want to do that, they wanted to [insert something else here]. They got totally upset and yelled at them, and somehow 'accidentally' dumped their nachos in their hair!"

I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks this conversation sounds pretty jacked up. It's impossible to tell who is being referred to now, to the point where it sounds like someone attacked them self with melted cheese. It would be impossible to follow a conversation this way.
Now here's the version with the names used in place of some of the pronouns.

Person 1: "Did you hear about Jordan and Kendell?"
Person 2: "No, what happened?"
Person 1: "Well, Jordan said that they wanted to [insert something here], but Kendell didn't want to do that, Kendell wanted to [insert something else here]. Jordan got totally upset and yelled at them, and somehow Jordan 'accidentally' dumped their nachos in Kendell's hair!"

A lot less wacked up than before, and still gender neutral. In fact, I used gender neutral names, so if I'd never specified genders in the first version of the conversation, it would be a lot harder to tell who's which gender, or even whether 'Jordan' and 'Kendell' are different genders in the first place.
Of course, it's not perfect, but that's why humans were given the power to revise.

Person 1: "Did you hear about Jordan and Kendell?"
Person 2: "No, what happened?"
Person 1: "Well, Jordan wanted to [insert something here], but Kendell wanted to [insert something else here]. Jordan got totally upset and yelled at Kendell, and somehow Jordan's nachos 'accidentally' ended up in Kendell's hair!"
Person 2: "Omg!"


It's not impossible to be completely gender neutral in the English language. In fact, it's kind of easy, and even necessary in some situations. I would even say one could write an entire novel about a gender neutral race that speaks in a language startlingly similar to English, with the exception of it's fewer amount of pronouns, without using 'he' or 'she' once, provided the author has enough patience.

And  that is all I know about writing without gender in the English language.

7 comments:

  1. First off, this is an interesting topic to write about, and I love how you use the writing experience to process the thoughts. Furthermore, the notion of gender being neutral is in an of itself a debatable topic. Is it bad to identify gender? Meanwhile, the use of "they" to replace the gender specific pronouns is actually improper, not only because of the lack of specificity, but because "they" is obviously plural, and not intended for such use. This response brought out the English nerd in me. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with Mr.Johnson. I believe it would be much simpler and more understandable to use the word "It" instead of he or she. You still have the problem of understanding who "it" is, but at least it sounds better.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I also thought this was a very interesting piece. I really wish I could do what you are able to: take a somewhat random and simple topic and create this long, detailed post that is amusing and informative at the same time. Nice job, Jordan.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Jordan, this is such a interesting thought! It would really be a different world if there was no such thing as gender. Also, putting "they" in for one person made it confusing because it sounded like more than one person but "it" would work. Good job!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Almost every post that I read on this blog makes me laugh at some point but also makes me think quite hard (I haven't decided if that's good or bad). This was a really interesting topic and I really liked how you showed how it worked both ways. The English language is quite confusing but it offers very unique possibilities. Great post.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with everyone else that this was a very interesting topic, and it helped how you showed examples of what you were talking about otherwise i am sure we would have gotten lost. Try exploring other words that could be used rather than just "they". Nice job.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I really like that you picked a topic like this to write about. It's things like this that makes the English language both great, and confusing. There never seems to be an end to the way people write, and it's good how you brought out something I never even considered. Really nice job!

    ReplyDelete